Books Institute of Business Studies of Montevideo IEEM

HBP publishing alternatives

If you wish to publish a CBCC pedagogical case in HBP it is necessary to submit the case for evaluation to the collection through one of these two ways:

(a) Pre-selection of the case at the BALAS conference or at the CLADEA conference

(b) CBCC Institutional Membership

FIRST ALTERNATIVE

Case pre-selection at
BALAS conference or CLADEA conference

In this variant, any academic can send their cases to the annual conferences of CLADEA or BALAS, which offer a space to receive this type of material. The best cases from both conferences are eligible for access to the CBCC evaluation process. The precise conditions of access are agreed upon by the person responsible for the case track of each conference with the Editor of the consortium.

Teachers discussing, talking at a FGV table - EAESP

SECOND ALTERNATIVE

CBCC Institutional Membership

In this modality it is necessary that the interested academic is part of a CBCC member school. If so, he/she should inquire with his/her school about the criteria established for sending cases to CBCC.

To become a member of the CBCC, an interested institution must be a member of CLADEA and must demonstrate to the Editorial Board of the collection the fulfillment of a series of requirements. One of these requirements is the commitment to submit at least two high quality cases annually.

Instructor paying attention to what they mention in a session.

Documents

More Information

Consult in the documents the details of admission and permanence to the CBCC.

TESTIMONIALS

Publish in CBCC

"A good case allows the participant to live and learn from the challenging managerial experience that is recounted. Publishing a case through CBCC has allowed us to overcome many of the obstacles in the process. The reviewers' input and editing, with their critical, objective and professional views, greatly enhance the quality of the product."

Leonardo Veiga

Professor of Political Economy at IEEM, Uruguay

Review process

"I emphasize the peer review process from other countries, which is extremely valuable for the improvement of the case, particularly its understanding outside the country of origin. For the participants, it provides the security of working on a case that will achieve its learning objectives, thanks to the rigor with which they work on the development and evaluation of the learning note".